Free Web Hosting Provider - Web Hosting - E-commerce - High Speed Internet - Free Web Page
Search the Web

VOICE OF AMERICAS

(VOA)

"A geostrategic issue of crucial importance is posed by China's emergence as a major power. The most appealing outcome would be to co-opt a democratizing and flee-marketing China into a larger Asian regional framework of cooperation. But suppose China does not democratize but continues to grow in economic and military power? A "Greater China" may be emerging, whatever the desires and calculations of its neighbors, and any effort to prevent that from happening could entail an intensifying conflict with China. Such a conflict could strain American-Japanese relations -- for it is far from certain that Japan would want to follow America's lead in containing China -- and could therefore have potentially revolutionary consequences for Tokyo's definition of Japan's regional role, perhaps even resulting in the termination of the American presence in the Far East.

However, accommodation with China will also exact its own price. To accept China as a regional power is not a matter of simply endorsing a mere slogan. There will have to be substance to any such regional preeminence. To put it very directly, how large a Chinese sphere of influence, and where, should America be prepared to accept as part of a policy of successfully co-opting China into world affairs? What areas now outside of China's political radius might have to be conceded to the realm of the reemerging Celestial Empire?" - Zbigneiw Brzezinski

In 1997, Zbigneiw Brzezinski, wrote "The Grand Chessboard - American Primacy and it's Geostrategic Imperatives", which called for the American Dominance over Eurasia.  As it is believed, "Those who control Eurasia control the Planet", and to accomplish this, the US would have to Prevent China from Acquiring Supremacy in Eurasia...... which means War......

In 1998, Two senior PLA Air Force colonels, Qiao Liang and Wang Xiangsui, wrote "Unrestricted Warfare" in Direct response to The Grand Chessboard.  Throughout this book, it is described how it would be feasible for Low Tech to Overcome High Tech, which could be used to Destroy America.

(on a little side note, Chinese Premier Zhu Rongji jokes publicly about the September 11 attacks)

I know that many of you are already thinking that "just because it's in a book, doesn't make it true"..... which is why I ask that you try reading them before dismissing this whole theory I'm about to type.... I also Tried to reference everything I could with Documents from the most Reliable Sources I could Find

Within these 2 books, is a basic format of how to acquire the goal of being the Hegemonic Country that carries the Planet through the 21st Century....... and it seems these books are being followed quite closely.

The Grand Chessboard, states that the only way America would be able to be the Dominant Power in Eurasia, would require a "Pearl Harbor Styled Attack" to give the US Government the ability to change it's Foreign Policy towards Dominance...... which is Exactly what happened with George Bush's National Security Strategy for the United States it states that "as a matter of common sense and self-defense, America will act against such emerging threats before they are fully formed' and `to forestall or prevent such hostile acts by our adversaries, the United States will, if necessary, act preemptively"

and according to the CHINA SECURITY REVIEW COMMISSION - REPORT TO CONGRESS OF THE U.S. - JULY 2002, in -Chapter 7 - Proliferation and Chinese Relations with Terrorist-Sponsoring States......... (China, is Considered a Threat)

....... The Axis of Evil......

Using September 11th, the United States began their conquest of the Middle East, starting with Afghanistan, Iraq, and soon to be Iran...... as these three countries are necessary for holding a Geostrategic Influence over the Middle East. (which, if you read the link to "the Grand Chessboard" you'll understand)

Each of these, Important to China..... will China let America threaten it's National Interests? Such as..... Iraq being the Biggest Supplier of Oil to China (refer to 1997 China-Iraq Oil deal)

In comes North Korea

N. Korea is a Chinese Wild Card...... a country that's nuclear capable, ICBM's that can potentially reach Chicago, and has a leader that's threatened to Nuke America.  China uses N. Korea to Launch Nukes at America....or American Interests, like Japan, S. Korea, Taiwan, Guam...... Who would America retaliate against...... N. Korea or China?

Then there's the "List of 60+ other countries" that the President Bush considers as "Terrorist Harboring or Sponsoring States" (though the full list has never been disclosed)

but it would almost be safe to say that Within the "List of 60", America has created a Half Circle around China........ leaving the Russian Border Open...... Russia will be the deciding factor, and I believe whoever allows a blind eye to be turned to the expansion into some of their old Satellite Countries, will be who Russia sides with...... and as it stands, Russia is against this War in Iraq....  to the point, they were giving Iraq Military Equipment after America had already been in Iraq for Days.  So, it's not looking good, if America wants Russia as an Ally, for a War against China....... read the Russia page if you want to know more..... now back to China

China, more then any other country since 9-11-01, has remained fairly silent in the World of Politics, they've just been sitting back watching what America does......even after the US has repeatedly tried "Provoking" China..... the EP-3 Spy Plane Incident, the Bombing of the Chinese Embassy, the "Spy Bugs" on President Zemin's Boeing..... and now PreEmptiveness against many of China's Economic Partners?

China's response to each incident?...... China disassembled the EP-3 Plane and shipped it back to America...... China, though did nothing through action, they refuse to believe any excuse we have to offer, for the Bombing of their Embassy....... and Silence upon the Bugged Plane incident (which almost prevented the Bush-Zemin meeting in February of 2002)......... China asked the United States to Halt the War against Iraq Immediately.

So far, China has shown that they are taking a Passive Route, but that could very easily change

.... and we think that their efforts will bear no fruit, if they attempt anything......

"Since the 7 May 1999 bombing of China’s embassy in Belgrade, China’s leaders reportedly have been discussing ways to offset US power, to include accelerating military modernization, pursing strategic cooperation with Russia, and increasing China’s proliferation activities abroad. However, none of these options is likely to improve fundamentally Beijing’s position." - China Report to Congress - Pursuant to the FY2000 National Defense Authorization Act

China's Offensive Move against the United States would be Taiwan and the N. Korean Wild Card, but Taiwan, would be a Last Resort, as "Unrestricted Warfare" offers a Variety of ways to Destroy America without a Serious Military Match Up, but does not leave that subject undiscussed.  Which China has been Preparing for, within the past 5 years, according to their "Stated Budget Reports"

"The exercise of American global primacy must be sensitive to the fact that political geography remains a critical consideration in international affairs. Napoleon reportedly once said that to know a nation's geography was to know its foreign policy. Our understanding of the importance of political geography, however, must adapt to the new realities of power.

For most of the history of international affairs, territorial control was the focus of political conflict. Either national self-gratification over the acquisition of larger territory or the sense of national deprivation over the loss of "sacred" land has been the cause of most of the bloody wars fought since the rise of nationalism. It is no exaggeration to say that the territorial imperative has been the main impulse driving the aggressive behavior of nation-states. Empires were also built through the careful seizure and retention of vital geographic assets, such as Gibraltar or the Suez Canal or Singapore, which served as key choke points or linchpins in a system of imperial control" - Zbigneiw Brzezinski

China, knowing that attacking Taiwan prematurely, will bring a repercussion of massive US Military Force, they will watch America for awhile..... "The Blind Man and the Elephant"

Bush Administration already pledged to do "whatever it takes" to defend Taiwan, in accordance to the Taiwan Relations Act

With the US Military Occupied in the Middle East, Trying to Protect Taiwan, and Dealing with the N. Korean Wild Card, China has a variety of options that open for them.

Try to use Diplomatic Processes to halt the US War...... Assist (Arms & Finances) those that the US is Attacking (Proxy Wars)....... Take Taiwan, and go to War with America.

Assisting those that the US are Fighting, could allow China to increase their Military Industrial Complex on an Exponential Factor, which would obviously hinder the US War Plans and create a US vs China style Vietnam, that many are expecting this war to eventually come to........

While, "Unrestricted Warfare" Supports the creation of a Vietnam Styled Conflict, it is questionable if it would be the best route to take, unless China is wanting a Mass Population Reduction.....which, could be very possible, as they have a population of 1.4 Billion people..... and we already know America's up for Population Reduction...... (or at least some in Congress want "H. CON. RES. 70" passed)

Now, as I stated earlier, Russia is going to be the deciding Factor in who is the winner for the position of "the Lone Hyper-Power"..... yea, there's some who claim the US is a Lone Super Power, but it is impossible to claim that 1/5th of the World's Population is Not a Super Power.  The Difference between a Super Power and a Hyper Power, is the Super Power has a relatively close Rival to some aspect of the Sphere of Influence of a Nation, be it Military, Economic, Social, or Political....... the Hyper Power has no Rival.

George Bush's National Security Strategy, calls for the US to have No Rivals

Since the Rise of Communism in the bitterness of the Cold War, one of America's Greatest Fear was a Russian-Chinese total peace agreement, and them attacking America...... after the Fall of Soviet Russia, this fear has been close to forgotten, yet is closer then it has ever been. (High-Level Political/Military Visits Between Beijing and Moscow Strengthen "Strategic Alliance" Against U.S./NATO ----- United States Security Strategy for Europe and NATO)

Any Option that is Chosen, means an inevitable end to the US quest for the Status of Hyper Power.

........ The Peace Process.......

If the Diplomatic process is used, this could grant the UN the ability to become effective in their Role as "Peace Keepers" and Strengthen their ability to uphold their Resolutions and position as International Body of Law...... which could in all essence, be the creation of a World Governing Body.

If this were to happen, it would be very possible that the US could lose their position on the Security Council, which I see the US attempting to pull out of the UN if the UN tries to stop it's Quest........ This would obviously cause some havoc in the UN which could destroy the UN, but China, Russia, and the EU could easily make up for the loss of the US and it's Obligations towards the UN.

For the US to block the UN Peace Process and continue the Road to Hyper Power, would require the destruction of the UN, but in a show of Good Faith, the US will wait till the UN acts against them.

Back to the Peace process......

There's close to 200 Countries on this Planet, and in the "Coalition of the Willing" (there has never been a straight and definite number given) is made up of somewhere between 30-45 Countries, which leaves 140+ that don't seem to be "Willing" to assist America's War ( I use 140, since some countries are probably helping the US behind the scenes)

So, these 140 countries that are left, Pressure the US to stop their War and Quest for Hyper Power Status, the US can not survive in it's current state, if it's cut off from the world......... and the US falls like the Soviet Union... but the National Security Strategy will not allow for that...... for us, it's either World Domination or Total Destruction......"We will not tire, we will not falter, and we will not fail" - George Bush Jr.

Already, a few countries have started boycotting American Goods..... Germany, Russia, France...... what if this were to catch on?....... What would happen if the US was cut off from the rest of the world, outside of Pax Americana?

...... The American-Chinese "Vietnam".........

With the Peace Process, seemingly Failed, every possible scenario I could think of, Leads me to wonder what China would do, if they didn't want to Fight the US at first, but instead let them wear out their resources, fatigue their military, and strain their nation (with assistance from potential world wide sanctions from an attempted peace process)

This could cause the Chinese Military Industrial Complex a chance to catch up to the US technologically, as they could just sit back and support guerillas in Iraq, Iran, Afghanistan, Syria, N. Korea ........ which of course, is going to increase their Economy and their "Middle Eastern" Sphere of Influence

If this were to happen, "Terrorism" would increase a thousand fold, throughout the Middle East and the Coalition Countries, pulling the Coalition Countries into a long drawn out War.

During the drawn out war, inevitably the Arabic World would unite, as they will see the Coalition as Occupiers and not Liberators

This war, if it were to happen, it would most likely follow the Unrestricted Warfare's Words, as it has already done before.

 CHICOM BACKGROUND INFORMATION

Varity of Department of Defense Articles and Documents on US-China Relations, and perceived threats from China

300 short range missiles face Taiwan

DongFeng-31 Missile

China controls the Panama Canal

Chinese Military Power page

General Info on China

Secretary Rumsfeld Outlines Space Initiatives

Annual Report to the President and the Congress, from the Dept. of Defense

The United States Security Strategy for the East Asia - Pacific Region 1998

East Asia Strategy Report 1995

United States Security Strategy for Europe and NATO

A geostrategy for Eurasia by Zbigniew Brzezinski

CHINA - A Country Study (Library of Congress)

King Khan - Alternate Futures for 2025

Defense Issues: Volume 10, Number 109-- U.S. Strategy: Engage China, Not Contain It

State Department - China Page

Russia-China Deal Makes NASA Uneasy

United States Security Strategy for the Middle East - 1995

China expands ties "in all fields" with Iran, Lybia, Syria - Pakistan prepares to buy warships from Beijing

Pentagon warns of China threat - July 17, 2002 - CNN

PRC to quadruple nuke missiles aimed at US by 2015; China helped Pakistan develop nuclear weapons

Chinese military White Paper calls for an "Electronic Pearl Harbor"

Iran-Russia-China axis seeks to limit US power

New China-Iran Pact Enhances Military Cooperation; Chinese Navy Modernizes, US Pacific Fleet Cut 40 Percent

Chinese Military Prepares for War Using Mock US Military Base Built with Knowledge from US-China Military Exchanges

Taipei: PLA air superiority over Strait in 3 to 5 years; Former CIA director warns of Clinton "appeasement"

Beijing Threatens to Attack US Pacific Fleet, Launch Nuke Strikes on US Policy

Pentagon Assessment Warns of China-Dominated Asia in 2025

Beijing describes how to defeat U.S, in high-tech war; Russia-China military technology agreement detailed

China's "Western" Sphere of Influence

PLA Electromagnetic Pulse Bombs Can Destroy US Fleets; PLA Telecommunications Corporations Described

Pentagon Study: PRC Preparing for War vs US (DoD Report from defenselink.mil coming soon)

Chinese Defense Minister in Moscow Forges Anti-US Alliance

China's new ICBM carries decoys to defeat future U.S. missile defense

Defense Minister: PLA preparing for war with U.S

Lax Security Enabled China to Build Neutron Bomb with U.S. Data

China Receives Advanced Kilo-Class Submarine from Russia

China restructures military industries

Jiang Tells PLA of U.S. "Hegemonists" Threat

China plans long-range missile test in late July; PLA commissions "stealth" warship

Moscow Sells 72 Advanced Sukhoi-30 Fighter-Bombers to Beijing

China to Build New Communications Spy Base in Cuba

China sells WMD's to Iran and Pakistan

Pentagon: elite U.S. Special Forces seek to train Chinese commando

China readies for future U.S. fight (CNN - Tuesday, March 25, 2003 )

CHINA'S MILITARY STRATEGY TOWARD THE US

Budget boost for China's military

China's Military Strategy and Security in the Taiwan Strait

PRC Air Force

CHINA'S MILITARY POTENTIAL: Foreword and Summary

China: Military Imports From the United States and the European Union

China's military starts war games near Taiwan -- The Washington Times

Senator Kyl Remarks on China's Military Policy

Halt Encryption Software Sales To China's Military

US Dept. of State - IIP: The United States and China

CHINA: AIRPOWER DEVELOPMENT

Pravda.RU Beijing waiting for US-Iraq war?

Selected Military Capabilities of the People's Republic of China

China and the United States: From Hostility to Engagement

Is China a Military Threat? Video

MILITARY CAPABILITIES OF THE PEOPLE'S REPUBLIC OF CHINA

Military Laws of the People's Republic of China

IV. Military Exchanges Between China and the US

US Military Technology That China Is Believed to Have Acquired

China Condemns US Congressional Acts on Military Cooperation With Taiwan

China Reaffirms Military Ties with DPRK

Ten Obstacles to China Becoming A Strong Military Power

The House Policy Committee - China Report